This Is How It Always Is – The Unseen Rules Shaping Modern Life

Published

Table of Contents

There’s a quiet certainty in the world that feels like a law of physics. A meeting starts late, the coffee is bitter, the email chain spirals into absurdity—this is how it always is. Not because it’s inevitable, but because the systems that govern these moments are designed to reproduce themselves, again and again. The repetition isn’t accidental; it’s engineered into the fabric of how we organize time, labor, and even thought.

The phrase "this is how it always is" isn’t just resignation—it’s a confession. It admits that some things resist change not because they’re perfect, but because they’re comfortable. The office hierarchy, the 9-to-5 grind, the way we measure success by hours logged rather than outcomes—these aren’t just traditions; they’re self-perpetuating machines. And the most insidious part? We often mistake their persistence for wisdom.

What if the repetition isn’t a sign of stability, but of stagnation? What if the systems we accept as natural are actually the result of deliberate choices—some made centuries ago, others reinforced daily? The answer lies in understanding how these patterns form, why they endure, and how they shape everything from our careers to our relationships. This is the story of the unseen forces that make us say, "This is how it always is"—and how to recognize when it’s time to break the cycle.

this is how it always is

The Complete Overview of "This Is How It Always Is"

The phrase "this is how it always is" isn’t just a cultural shorthand—it’s a psychological and structural phenomenon. It describes the way human systems, once established, develop an inertia that resists disruption. Whether it’s the layout of a city grid, the rhythm of a workweek, or the unspoken rules of social interaction, these patterns aren’t arbitrary. They’re the result of historical necessity, institutional design, and collective habit. The key to understanding them is recognizing that what feels like fate is often just feedback: a loop where the output of one generation becomes the input of the next, with minimal adjustment.

The persistence of these systems isn’t just about tradition—it’s about power. Who benefits from the status quo? Who has the resources to maintain it? The answer shapes everything from education to economic mobility. Take the concept of "productivity" as an example. For decades, we’ve measured it in hours worked, not outcomes achieved—a framework that rewards presenteeism over efficiency. The result? A culture where burnout is normalized, and the phrase "this is how it always is" becomes a justification for exhaustion. But the system wasn’t always like this. It was built this way, and it stays this way because the people who profit from it have no incentive to change it.

Historical Background and Evolution

The idea that certain structures are immutable is older than modern society. Ancient civilizations built their cities around religious or military needs, and those layouts often endured for millennia. Rome’s grid system, for instance, wasn’t just practical—it was a tool of control, designed to facilitate surveillance and movement of troops. Fast-forward to the Industrial Revolution, and you see the same logic applied to labor. Factories required workers to punch clocks, not because it was the most efficient way to organize human effort, but because it was the easiest way to monitor it. The 8-hour workday became a compromise, but the underlying assumption—that time is money and must be accounted for—persisted. That’s why, today, we still hear "this is how it always is" when someone suggests flexible hours: the system was never designed for flexibility.

Even the way we structure time reflects this inertia. The Gregorian calendar, with its 7-day week rooted in religious cycles, feels natural now, but it wasn’t always this way. Different cultures had different temporal rhythms—some based on lunar cycles, others on agricultural seasons. The modern week, with its rigid division between work and rest, was imposed by industrial capitalism. It wasn’t an organic evolution; it was a deliberate choice to align labor with machinery. The persistence of this structure, despite its flaws (e.g., the mismatch between biological rhythms and artificial deadlines), proves how deeply these systems embed themselves. Once installed, they become the default, and the phrase "this is how it always is" becomes a shield against questioning them.

Core Mechanisms: How It Works

At its core, the phenomenon of "this is how it always is" operates through three interconnected mechanisms: institutional lock-in, cognitive bias, and resource dependency. Institutional lock-in occurs when a system becomes so entrenched that the cost of changing it exceeds the perceived benefit. Think of the QWERTY keyboard layout, designed in the 1870s to slow down typists (and prevent jams in early typewriters). It’s inefficient by modern standards, yet it persists because switching would require retraining millions of people—a cost no one is willing to bear. Similarly, the way we fund education, healthcare, or infrastructure is often locked into place by legacy systems, making reform seem impossible.

Cognitive bias plays a critical role. Humans are wired to prefer familiarity over novelty, a trait known as the status quo bias. When faced with a familiar but suboptimal system, we often assume it’s the best possible option simply because it’s what we know. This is why workplace hierarchies, despite their inefficiencies, are rarely questioned—because they feel "normal." Even when alternatives exist, the mental effort required to imagine a different way of doing things is too high. The phrase "this is how it always is" becomes a mental shortcut, a way to avoid the discomfort of uncertainty.

Finally, resource dependency ensures that systems reproduce themselves. Who controls the resources—money, influence, expertise—has the power to maintain the status quo. A corporation that benefits from the current labor model won’t voluntarily adopt flexible work unless forced to. A government that profits from fossil fuels won’t transition to renewables unless public pressure becomes overwhelming. The result? A self-reinforcing cycle where the people who say "this is how it always is" are often the ones who stand to lose the most if it changes.

Key Benefits and Crucial Impact

On the surface, the repetition of "this is how it always is" provides stability. Predictability is a psychological comfort—it reduces anxiety, simplifies decision-making, and allows us to function in a complex world without constant reinvention. For institutions, this predictability translates to efficiency. A bank knows how to process loans because the system hasn’t changed in decades. A school follows a curriculum because it’s been tested (and funded) for generations. Even in personal life, the repetition of routines—meals at the same time, bedtime stories for children—creates a sense of security. There’s a reason why humans cling to tradition: it’s a survival mechanism.

Yet the impact of this repetition is far from neutral. The phrase "this is how it always is" can also be a tool of oppression. Systems that persist because of inertia often do so at the expense of marginalized groups. The rigid 9-to-5 schedule, for example, was designed for a specific demographic: able-bodied, childless adults with no caregiving responsibilities. It ignores the realities of single parents, neurodivergent workers, or those with chronic illnesses. The result? A workforce where millions feel forced to choose between their health and their livelihood, all while hearing "this is how it always is" as a justification for their struggle. The same logic applies to urban planning—highways built in the 1950s prioritized car traffic over pedestrian safety, a design choice that still shapes inequality today.

"Tradition is a guide, not a cage. The moment we mistake repetition for wisdom, we surrender our agency to the past." — Yuval Noah Harari, Sapiens

Major Advantages

Despite its drawbacks, the phenomenon of "this is how it always is" offers undeniable advantages:
  • Efficiency through standardization: Uniform systems (like traffic laws or accounting standards) reduce friction in daily life. Without them, chaos would reign.
  • Cultural continuity: Rituals, holidays, and family traditions provide a sense of belonging across generations, fostering social cohesion.
  • Risk mitigation: Institutions (banks, governments, corporations) rely on predictable patterns to avoid catastrophic failure. Innovation is risky; stability is safer.
  • Psychological comfort: Routine reduces cognitive load. Knowing what to expect lowers stress and allows us to focus on other tasks.
  • Institutional resilience: Long-standing systems (like legal codes or scientific methods) have withstood time because they’ve been refined over centuries, not because they’re perfect.
The challenge lies in distinguishing between the repetition that serves us and the repetition that enslaves us. The phrase "this is how it always is" becomes dangerous when it’s used to justify harm under the guise of tradition.

this is how it always is - Ilustrasi 2

Comparative Analysis

Not all systems that persist are created equal. Some evolve; others ossify. Below is a comparison of two types of repetition: adaptive traditions (those that change with context) and rigid inertia (those that resist change despite evidence).
Adaptive Traditions Rigid Inertia
Examples: Family recipes adjusted for dietary needs, corporate cultures that embrace feedback loops, legal systems that update with societal values. Examples: Outdated workplace hierarchies, gender roles that ignore modern equality, urban infrastructure designed for past needs.
Mechanism: Feedback-driven. Systems are regularly assessed and modified based on new information. Mechanism: Path dependency. The cost of change is perceived as too high, so the system lags behind reality.
Outcome: Sustainable, resilient, and capable of addressing new challenges. Outcome: Inefficient, inequitable, and prone to crisis when external conditions shift.
Psychological effect: Encourages innovation while preserving core values. Psychological effect: Reinforces helplessness ("this is how it always is") and stifles dissent.
The difference between these two isn’t just about age or size—it’s about intent. Adaptive systems are designed to evolve; rigid ones are designed to endure, often at the expense of progress.
The phrase "this is how it always is" is already being challenged by forces that demand flexibility. Artificial intelligence, remote work, and decentralized economies are exposing the fragility of traditional systems. Companies that once required office attendance now operate globally, proving that the 9-to-5 isn’t a law of nature. Similarly, blockchain technology is dismantling the idea that financial systems must be controlled by centralized institutions. These shifts aren’t just technological—they’re cultural. Younger generations, raised on instant communication and global connectivity, reject the notion that "this is how it always is" as an excuse for stagnation.

Yet the backlash is fierce. Institutions that benefit from the status quo will resist change, using nostalgia as a weapon. The phrase "this is how it always is" will be wielded by those who fear disruption, framing innovation as chaos. But history shows that the systems we take for granted are rarely as permanent as they seem. The printing press, the internet, and the feminist movement all began as radical ideas that were once dismissed as impossible. The future of "this is how it always is" depends on whether we recognize it as a choice—or a prison.

this is how it always is - Ilustrasi 3

Conclusion

The next time you hear "this is how it always is," pause. Ask: Who benefits from this being the case? What would change if we didn’t accept it? The repetition of systems isn’t proof of their superiority—it’s evidence of their persistence. Some patterns deserve to endure; others are relics of a time we’ve outgrown. The key is discernment. Not all tradition is wisdom, and not all change is progress. But the refusal to question "this is how it always is" is a surrender of our collective future.

The systems we inherit were built by humans, for humans—and that means they can be rebuilt. The question isn’t whether we’ll change them, but how intentionally we’ll do it.

Comprehensive FAQs

Q: Why do people say "this is how it always is" even when things clearly aren’t working?

A: This phrase is a psychological defense mechanism. It reduces cognitive dissonance—the mental discomfort of recognizing a problem without knowing how to fix it. By accepting the status quo, people avoid the anxiety of change, even if the current system is harmful. Institutions reinforce this mindset by framing disruption as risky, while stability is framed as safe—even when the "stability" is stagnation.

Q: Are there any systems where "this is how it always is" is actually a good thing?

A: Yes, but they’re rare and intentional. Systems like scientific peer review or constitutional democracy persist because they’ve been rigorously tested and proven effective over time. The difference is that these systems include built-in mechanisms for self-correction (e.g., peer review allows for new evidence to overturn old conclusions). The danger arises when systems lack these feedback loops, leading to unchecked inertia.

Q: How can individuals push back against the idea that "this is how it always is" in their daily lives?

A: Start by questioning assumptions. Instead of accepting a routine as fixed, ask: Who designed this? Why? Experiment with small changes—like negotiating flexible hours, advocating for policy updates at work, or supporting community initiatives that challenge norms. Collective action amplifies individual efforts. The phrase "this is how it always is" loses power when enough people refuse to say it.

Q: What historical examples show that "this is how it always is" isn’t truly inevitable?

A: The abolition of slavery, the fall of the Berlin Wall, and the legalization of same-sex marriage were all once considered impossible. Each required sustained pressure from marginalized groups who refused to accept "this is how it always is" as a final answer. Even smaller shifts—like the decline of the traditional nuclear family or the rise of plant-based diets—prove that cultural norms aren’t fixed. The common thread? People who refused to treat repetition as destiny.

Q: Can technology help break the cycle of "this is how it always is"?

A: Technology is both a tool of inertia and a catalyst for change. On one hand, algorithms and automation can reinforce existing systems (e.g., hiring biases in AI, social media echo chambers). On the other, tools like blockchain, decentralized platforms, and AI-driven optimization can expose inefficiencies in rigid systems. The key is using technology to design for adaptability—building systems that allow for iteration rather than locking in outdated norms.

Q: Is there a difference between "this is how it always is" in personal life vs. societal structures?

A: Absolutely. Personal habits (like morning routines or weekend rituals) often adapt organically based on individual needs. Societal structures, however, are designed by powerful groups with vested interests in maintaining them. The phrase "this is how it always is" in personal life might just mean "this is my comfort zone." In societal contexts, it’s often a smokescreen for power dynamics. Recognizing the difference is crucial—changing a personal habit is easier than dismantling a systemic one, but both require intentionality.